Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal

From WeSISpedia
Revision as of 16:44, 12 March 2020 by Jgerlitz (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Indicator |datatype = Numeric |scale = Metric |valuelabels = <ul> <li>0 = there are no procedural requirements for dismissal</li> <li>0.33 = failure to follow procedural re...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Quick info
Data type Numeric
Scale Metric
Value labels
  • 0 = there are no procedural requirements for dismissal
  • 0.33 = failure to follow procedural requirement is just one factor taken into account in unjust dismissal cases
  • 0.67 = failure to follow procedural requirements will normally lead to a finding of unjust dismissal
  • 1 = dismissal is necessarily unjust if the employer fails to follow procedural requirements prior to dismissal
  • quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law

Technical name labor_pro_dis_con
Category Labour and labour market
Label Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal
Related indicators

This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent failure to follow procedural requirements constitute an unjust dismissal.


Coding rules

The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds an absense of procedural requirements and "1" to dismissals being necessarily being unjust if employers fails to follow procedural requirements, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).


Bibliographic info

Citation:


Related publications:



Misc

Project manager(s):
  • Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; research fellows: Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs


Data release:


Revisions:

Sources