Difference between revisions of "Privileging function"

From WeSISpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|datatype = Numeric
 
|datatype = Numeric
 
|scale = Metric
 
|scale = Metric
|valuelabels = 0 to 1. 1 is the maximum value, it reflects the highest possible level of norm-related privileging.
+
|valuelabels = <ul>
 +
<li>0 to 1. 1 is the maximum value, it reflects the highest possible level of norm-related privileging. </li>
 +
</ul>
 
|techname =  labor_priv_func
 
|techname =  labor_priv_func
 
|category = [[Labour and labour market |Labour and labour market]]
 
|category = [[Labour and labour market |Labour and labour market]]
Line 21: Line 23:
 
|codingrules = The index calculation relies on three CBR-LRI and four WoL indicators: Legally mandated notice period increases with seniority, Legally mandated severance compensation increases with seniority, Seniority is a decisive redundancy selection criterion, Priority in re-employment, Dismissal protection depends on size of enterprise, The law determines the legal status of the worker and Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal. We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. We normalised the scale of the dimension selectivity, that is, we divided it by it's empirical maximum.  
 
|codingrules = The index calculation relies on three CBR-LRI and four WoL indicators: Legally mandated notice period increases with seniority, Legally mandated severance compensation increases with seniority, Seniority is a decisive redundancy selection criterion, Priority in re-employment, Dismissal protection depends on size of enterprise, The law determines the legal status of the worker and Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal. We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. We normalised the scale of the dimension selectivity, that is, we divided it by it's empirical maximum.  
 
|citation =  
 
|citation =  
<ul>
+
Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5'', Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf]
<li>Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5'', Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf]
+
Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. FORTHCOMING. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the SPE Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." Manuscript under review at the ''Industrial Law Journal''.
<li>Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. FORTHCOMING. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the SPE Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." Manuscript under review at the ''Industrial Law Journal''.
+
 
</ul>
 
  
 
|relatedpublications =  
 
|relatedpublications =  
Line 39: Line 40:
  
 
|projectmanagers =  
 
|projectmanagers =  
<ul>
 
<li>Andrea Schäfer</li>
 
</ul>
 
  
|datarelease =
+
<li>Andrea Schäfer
<ul>
+
 
<li></li>
+
|datarelease = <ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul>
</ul>
+
|revisions = No revisions yet
  
|revisions =
 
<ul>
 
<li></li>
 
</ul>
 
  
 
|sources =  
 
|sources =  

Revision as of 15:24, 8 November 2021

Quick info
Data type Numeric
Scale Metric
Value labels
  • 0 to 1. 1 is the maximum value, it reflects the highest possible level of norm-related privileging.
Technical name labor_priv_func
Category Labour and labour market
Label Privileging function
Related indicators

The privileging function refers to legal norms that actively promote specific parts of the labour force. These norms link employment protection to specific conditions that are covered by the two dimensions seniority and selectivity and measured by seven indicators. This function measures the level of norm-related privileging in individual labour law and is a form of legal segmentation.


Coding rules

The index calculation relies on three CBR-LRI and four WoL indicators: Legally mandated notice period increases with seniority, Legally mandated severance compensation increases with seniority, Seniority is a decisive redundancy selection criterion, Priority in re-employment, Dismissal protection depends on size of enterprise, The law determines the legal status of the worker and Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal. We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. We normalised the scale of the dimension selectivity, that is, we divided it by it's empirical maximum.


Bibliographic info

Citation: Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5, Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. FORTHCOMING. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the SPE Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." Manuscript under review at the Industrial Law Journal.


Related publications:



Misc

Project manager(s):
  • Andrea Schäfer Data release:
    • Version 0.001: Initial release


    Revisions: No revisions yet

    Sources

    • Own coding