Difference between revisions of "Weekend working"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{IndicatorForm | {{IndicatorForm | ||
| − | |datatype = Numeric | + | |datatype=Numeric |
| − | + | |scale=Metric | |
| − | + | |scale=Metric | |
| − | |scale = Metric | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | |valuelabels = | + | |valuelabels=<ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>0 = there is no premium</li> | <li>0 = there is no premium</li> | ||
<li>0.5 = premium is time and half</li> | <li>0.5 = premium is time and half</li> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law | quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | |techname = | + | |techname=labor_weekend_work |
| − | |category = | + | |category=Labour and labour market |
| − | |label = Weekend working | + | |label=Weekend working |
| − | |relatedindicators = | + | |relatedindicators=<ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>[[Annual leave entitlements]]</li> | <li>[[Annual leave entitlements]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Public holiday entitlements]]</li> | <li>[[Public holiday entitlements]]</li> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 21: | ||
<li>[[Maximum daily working time]]</li> | <li>[[Maximum daily working time]]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures the normal premium for weekend working set by law or by collective agreements which are generally applicable. The same score is given for laws and for collective agreements which are de facto binding on most of the workforce (as in the case of systems which have extension legislation for collective agreements). | |
| − | |description = | + | |codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the nonexistence of a premium and "1" to a premium that is double time or a strict control or prohibition of weekend work. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). |
| − | This CBR-LRI indicator measures the normal premium for weekend working set by law or by collective agreements which are generally applicable. The same score is given for laws and for collective agreements which are de facto binding on most of the workforce (as in the case of systems which have extension legislation for collective agreements). | + | |citation=Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004] |
| − | + | |relatedpublications=<ul> | |
| − | |||
| − | |codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the nonexistence of a premium and "1" to a premium that is double time or a strict control or prohibition of weekend work. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). | ||
| − | |||
| − | |citation = | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |relatedpublications = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | ||
| Line 44: | Line 32: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |projectmanagers=Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer | |
| − | |projectmanagers = | + | |datarelease=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |datarelease = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | <li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |revisions=No revisions yet | |
| − | |revisions = | + | |sources=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |sources = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | <li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:29, 8 November 2021
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Metric |
| Value labels |
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law |
| Technical name | labor_weekend_work |
| Category | Labour and labour market |
| Label | Weekend working |
| Related indicators | |
This CBR-LRI indicator measures the normal premium for weekend working set by law or by collective agreements which are generally applicable. The same score is given for laws and for collective agreements which are de facto binding on most of the workforce (as in the case of systems which have extension legislation for collective agreements).
Coding rules
The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the nonexistence of a premium and "1" to a premium that is double time or a strict control or prohibition of weekend work. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
Bibliographic info
Citation: Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 33 (1): 59–91. http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004
Related publications:- Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
- Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x
Misc
Project manager(s): Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer
Data release:- Version 0.001: Initial release
Revisions: No revisions yet
Sources
- Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
