Difference between revisions of "Public holiday entitlements"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{IndicatorForm | {{IndicatorForm | ||
| − | |datatype = Numeric | + | |datatype=Numeric |
| − | |scale = Metric | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | |valuelabels = | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | <ul> | + | |scale=Metric |
| + | |valuelabels=<ul> | ||
<li>0 = 0 days</li> | <li>0 = 0 days</li> | ||
<li>1 = 18 days</li> | <li>1 = 18 days</li> | ||
normalised scale ranging from 0 to 1 | normalised scale ranging from 0 to 1 | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | |techname = | + | |techname=labor_pub_hol_ent |
| − | |category = | + | |category=Labour and labour market |
| − | |label = Public holiday entitlements | + | |label=Public holiday entitlements |
| − | |relatedindicators = | + | |relatedindicators=<ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>[[Annual leave entitlements]]</li> | <li>[[Annual leave entitlements]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Overtime premia]]</li> | <li>[[Overtime premia]]</li> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<li>[[Maximum daily working time]]</li> | <li>[[Maximum daily working time]]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures the normal number of paid public holidays guaranteed by law or collective agreement. The same score is given for laws and for collective agreements which are de facto binding on most of the workforce (as in the case of systems which have extension legislation for collective agreements). | |
| − | |description = | + | |codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale of the indicator was normalised so that "0" corresponds to 0 days and "1" to 18 days of paid holidays. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). |
| − | This CBR-LRI indicator measures the normal number of paid public holidays guaranteed by law or collective agreement. The same score is given for laws and for collective agreements which are de facto binding on most of the workforce (as in the case of systems which have extension legislation for collective agreements). | + | |citation=Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004] |
| − | + | |relatedpublications=<ul> | |
| − | |||
| − | |codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale of the indicator was normalised so that "0" corresponds to 0 days and "1" to 18 days of paid holidays. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). | ||
| − | |||
| − | |citation = | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |relatedpublications = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | ||
| Line 41: | Line 31: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |projectmanagers=Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer | |
| − | |projectmanagers = | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |datarelease=<ul> | |
| − | |datarelease = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | <li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |revisions=No revisions yet | |
| − | |revisions = | + | |sources=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |sources = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | <li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:27, 8 November 2021
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Metric |
| Value labels |
normalised scale ranging from 0 to 1 |
| Technical name | labor_pub_hol_ent |
| Category | Labour and labour market |
| Label | Public holiday entitlements |
| Related indicators | |
This CBR-LRI indicator measures the normal number of paid public holidays guaranteed by law or collective agreement. The same score is given for laws and for collective agreements which are de facto binding on most of the workforce (as in the case of systems which have extension legislation for collective agreements).
Coding rules
The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale of the indicator was normalised so that "0" corresponds to 0 days and "1" to 18 days of paid holidays. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
Bibliographic info
Citation: Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 33 (1): 59–91. http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004
Related publications:- Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
- Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x
Misc
Project manager(s): Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer </ul>
Data release:- Version 0.001: Initial release
Revisions: No revisions yet
Sources
- Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
