Difference between revisions of "Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal"

From WeSISpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Indicator
+
{{IndicatorForm
 
|datatype = Numeric
 
|datatype = Numeric
 
|scale = Metric
 
|scale = Metric
Line 54: Line 54:
 
|revisions =  
 
|revisions =  
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
  <li></li>
+
  <li>No revisions yet</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  

Revision as of 16:44, 22 July 2021

Quick info
Data type Numeric
Scale Metric
Value labels
  • 0 = there are no procedural requirements for dismissal
  • 0.33 = failure to follow procedural requirement is just one factor taken into account in unjust dismissal cases
  • 0.67 = failure to follow procedural requirements will normally lead to a finding of unjust dismissal
  • 1 = dismissal is necessarily unjust if the employer fails to follow procedural requirements prior to dismissal
  • quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law

Technical name labor_pro_dis_con
Category [[Labour and labour market]]
Label Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal
Related indicators

This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent failure to follow procedural requirements constitute an unjust dismissal.

Coding rules

The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to an absense of procedural requirements and "1" to dismissals being necessarily being unjust if employers fails to follow procedural requirements, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).

Bibliographic info

Citation: Related publications:

Misc

Project manager(s):
  • Jean-Yves Gerlitz
  • Andrea Schäfer
Data release:
Revisions:
  • No revisions yet

Sources