Difference between revisions of "Right to industrial action"

From WeSISpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{IndicatorForm |datatype=Numeric |scale=Metric |scale=Metric |scale=Metric |valuelabels=<ul><li>1 = the constitution grants the right to industrial action </li></ul> <ul><li...")
 
Line 21: Line 21:
 
<ul><li>[[Replacement of striking workers]]</li></ul>
 
<ul><li>[[Replacement of striking workers]]</li></ul>
 
|description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures whethers the legal system recognises and protects the right to industrial action (i.e. strike, go-slow or work-to-rule).
 
|description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures whethers the legal system recognises and protects the right to industrial action (i.e. strike, go-slow or work-to-rule).
|codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the legal system do recognise a different regulation and "1" to the legal system is granting the right to industrial action. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
+
|codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the legal system does recognise a different regulation and "1" to the legal system is granting the right to industrial action. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
 
|citation=<ul>
 
|citation=<ul>
 
<li>Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91.[http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]</li></ul>
 
<li>Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91.[http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]</li></ul>

Revision as of 13:16, 27 August 2020

Quick info
Data type Numeric
Scale Metric
Value labels
  • 1 = the constitution grants the right to industrial action
  • 0.67 = the constitution describes strikes as a matter of public policy or public interest
  • 0.33 = the constitution recognises strikes otherwise then above
  • 0 = otherwise

quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of law

Technical name labor_right_indact
Category Labour and labour market
Label Right to industrial action
Related indicators

This CBR-LRI indicator measures whethers the legal system recognises and protects the right to industrial action (i.e. strike, go-slow or work-to-rule).

Coding rules

The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the legal system does recognise a different regulation and "1" to the legal system is granting the right to industrial action. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).

Bibliographic info

Citation: Related publications:

Misc

Project manager(s): Karolin Meyer, Jean-Yves Gerlitz

Data release:

Revisions:

Sources

Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130