Difference between revisions of "Redundancy selection"
(Created page with "{{Indicator |datatype = Numeric |scale = Metric |valuelabels = <ul> <li>0 = employers don't have to follow priorty rules prior to dismissing for redundancy</li> <li>1 = by la...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|valuelabels = | |valuelabels = | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
| − | <li>0 = employers | + | <li>0 = employers does not have to follow priorty rules prior to dismissing for redundancy</li> |
<li>1 = by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority | <li>1 = by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority | ||
rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing | rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing | ||
Revision as of 17:35, 12 March 2020
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Metric |
| Value labels |
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law |
| Technical name | labor_redund_select |
| Category | Labour and labour market |
| Label | Redundancy selection |
| Related indicators |
|
This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent employers have to follow priority rules based on issues such as seniority, marital status, number of dependants etc. prior to a dismissal for redundancy.
Coding rules
The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to not having to follow priority rules and "1" to having to follow priority rules prior to a dismissal for redundancy, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
Bibliographic info
Citation:- Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 33 (1): 59–91. http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004
- Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
- Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x
Misc
Project manager(s):- Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; research fellows: Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs
Sources
- Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
