Difference between revisions of "Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal"

From WeSISpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Indicator |datatype = Numeric |scale = Metric |valuelabels = <ul> <li>0 = no remedy is available as of right</li> <li>0.33 = compensation is the normal remedy</li> <li>0.67...")
 
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
|description =  
 
|description =  
This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent dismissal is only permissible for substantive reasons such as serious misconduct or fault of the employee.
+
This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent reinstatement of an employee is the normal remedy for an unjust dismissal.
  
  

Revision as of 17:15, 12 March 2020

Quick info
Data type Numeric
Scale Metric
Value labels
  • 0 = no remedy is available as of right
  • 0.33 = compensation is the normal remedy
  • 0.67 = reinstatement and compensation are, de-jure and de-facto, alternative remedies
  • 1 = reinstatement is the normal remedy for unjust dismissal and is regularly enforced
  • quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law

Technical name labor_reinstate
Category Labour and labour market
Label Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal
Related indicators

This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent reinstatement of an employee is the normal remedy for an unjust dismissal.


Coding rules

The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to no remedy being available as of right and "1" to reinstatement being the normal remedy for unjust dismissal that is regularly enforced, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).


Bibliographic info

Citation:


Related publications:



Misc

Project manager(s):
  • Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; research fellows: Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs


Data release:


Revisions:

Sources