Difference between revisions of "Priority in re-employment"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{IndicatorForm | {{IndicatorForm | ||
| − | |datatype = Numeric | + | |datatype=Numeric |
| − | |scale = Metric | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | |valuelabels = | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | <ul> | + | |scale=Metric |
| + | |valuelabels=<ul> | ||
<li>0 = employers does not have to follow priorty rules</li> | <li>0 = employers does not have to follow priorty rules</li> | ||
<li>1 = by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority | <li>1 = by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law | quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | |techname = | + | |techname=labor_pri_re_emp |
| − | |category = | + | |category=Labour and labour market |
| − | |label = Priority in re-employment | + | |label=Priority in re-employment |
| − | |relatedindicators = | + | |relatedindicators=<ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li> | <li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li> | <li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<li>[[Redundancy selection]]</li> | <li>[[Redundancy selection]]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent employers have to follow priority rules relating to the re-employment of former workers. | |
| − | |description = | + | |codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to not having to follow priority rules and "1" to having to follow priority rules relating to the re-employment of former workers, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). |
| − | This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent employers have to follow priority rules relating to the re-employment of former workers. | + | |citation=Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004] |
| − | + | |relatedpublications=<ul> | |
| − | |||
| − | |codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to not having to follow priority rules and "1" to having to follow priority rules relating to the re-employment of former workers, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). | ||
| − | |||
| − | |citation = | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |relatedpublications = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | ||
| Line 44: | Line 34: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |projectmanagers=Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer | |
| − | |projectmanagers = | + | |datarelease=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |datarelease = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | <li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |revisions=No revisions yet | |
| − | |revisions = | + | |sources=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |sources = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | <li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:25, 8 November 2021
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Metric |
| Value labels |
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law |
| Technical name | labor_pri_re_emp |
| Category | Labour and labour market |
| Label | Priority in re-employment |
| Related indicators |
|
This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent employers have to follow priority rules relating to the re-employment of former workers.
Coding rules
The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to not having to follow priority rules and "1" to having to follow priority rules relating to the re-employment of former workers, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
Bibliographic info
Citation: Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 33 (1): 59–91. http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004
Related publications:- Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
- Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x
Misc
Project manager(s): Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer
Data release:- Version 0.001: Initial release
Revisions: No revisions yet
Sources
- Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
