Difference between revisions of "Deliberative democracy index"
Paul Bederke (talk | contribs) m (Update to V-Dem v11.1) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{IndicatorForm |
− | |datatype = Numeric | + | |datatype=Numeric |
− | |scale = Metric | + | |scale=Metric |
− | |valuelabels = Not applicable | + | |scale=Metric |
− | |techname = polnat_polity_democ_delibdem_vdem | + | |scale=Metric |
− | |category = | + | |valuelabels=Not applicable |
− | |label = Deliberative democracy index | + | |techname=polnat_polity_democ_delibdem_vdem |
− | |relatedindicators = | + | |category=Political factors |
− | + | |label=Deliberative democracy index | |
+ | |relatedindicators=<ul> | ||
<li>[[Electoral democracy index]]</li> | <li>[[Electoral democracy index]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Liberal democracy index]]</li> | <li>[[Liberal democracy index]]</li> | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
<li>[[Egalitarian democracy index]]</li> | <li>[[Egalitarian democracy index]]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | + | |description=The "Deliberative democracy index" is part of V-Dem's high level democracy indices capturing features of democracy at the most abstract level. | |
− | |description = | ||
− | The "Deliberative democracy index" is part of V-Dem's high level democracy indices capturing features of democracy at the most abstract level. | ||
The "Deliberative democracy index" in particular captures to what extent the ideal of '''deliberative''' democracy is achieved. It ranges from low (0) to high (1). | The "Deliberative democracy index" in particular captures to what extent the ideal of '''deliberative''' democracy is achieved. It ranges from low (0) to high (1). | ||
Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
public good should be informed by respectful and reasonable dialogue at all levels rather | public good should be informed by respectful and reasonable dialogue at all levels rather | ||
than by emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583). | than by emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583). | ||
− | + | |codingrules=The index is composed of several components and lower-level indices applying V-Dem's measurement model (Pemstein et al. 2021) which in turn are indices built from a number of indicators. The index itself is "a BFA [Bayesian factor analysis] attempting to measure the extent to which political elites offer public justifications for their positions on matters of public policy, justify their positions in terms of the public good, acknowledge and respect counter-arguments; and how wide the range of consultation is at elite levels (''v2xdl_delib'', based on 5 indicators)" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583) [emphasis in original; note that variable names in italics refer to V-Dem's nomenclature in their dataset, not in WeSIS]. | |
− | |codingrules = The index is composed of several components and lower-level indices applying V-Dem's measurement model (Pemstein et al. 2021) which in turn are indices built from a number of indicators. The index itself is "a BFA [Bayesian factor analysis] attempting to measure the extent to which political elites offer public justifications for their positions on matters of public policy, justify their positions in terms of the public good, acknowledge and respect counter-arguments; and how wide the range of consultation is at elite levels (''v2xdl_delib'', based on 5 indicators)" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583) [emphasis in original; note that variable names in italics refer to V-Dem's nomenclature in their dataset, not in WeSIS]. | ||
For the exact index aggregation formula see Coppedge et al. 2021, Appendix A. | For the exact index aggregation formula see Coppedge et al. 2021, Appendix A. | ||
− | + | |citation=Coppedge, Michael, Staffan Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell. 2016. "Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data". ''International Political Science Review'' 37 (2): 580-593. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046] | |
− | | citation = Coppedge, Michael, Staffan Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell. 2016. "Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data". ''International Political Science Review'' 37 (2): 580-593. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046] | + | |relatedpublications=<ul> |
− | |||
− | |relatedpublications = | ||
− | <ul> | ||
<li>Coppedge, Michael, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning and Jan Teorell. 2015. "Measuring High Level Democratic Principles using the V-Dem Data". [https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b5/b8/b5b8a046-eb68-4a24-8a1f-771c57e34d03/v-dem_working_paper_2015_6.pdf V-Dem Working Paper No. 6]. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute. | <li>Coppedge, Michael, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning and Jan Teorell. 2015. "Measuring High Level Democratic Principles using the V-Dem Data". [https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b5/b8/b5b8a046-eb68-4a24-8a1f-771c57e34d03/v-dem_working_paper_2015_6.pdf V-Dem Working Paper No. 6]. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute. | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 41: | Line 36: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | + | |projectmanagers=Nils Düpont (A01) | |
− | |projectmanagers = Nils Düpont (A01) | + | |datarelease=<ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul> |
− | + | |revisions=No revisions yet | |
− | |datarelease = | + | |sources=<ul> |
− | <ul> | + | <li>Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Nazifa Alizada, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Garry Hindle, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Josefine Pernes, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, Steven Wilson and Daniel Ziblatt. 2021. "V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v11.1" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. [https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21 https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21]</li> |
− | |||
− | </ul> | ||
− | |||
− | |revisions = | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |sources = | ||
− | <ul> | ||
− | <li>Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Nazifa Alizada, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Garry Hindle, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Josefine Pernes, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, Steven Wilson and Daniel Ziblatt. 2021. "V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v11.1" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. [https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21 https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21] | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:16, 25 October 2021
Quick info | |
---|---|
Data type | Numeric |
Scale | Metric |
Value labels | Not applicable |
Technical name | polnat_polity_democ_delibdem_vdem |
Category | Political factors |
Label | Deliberative democracy index |
Related indicators |
The "Deliberative democracy index" is part of V-Dem's high level democracy indices capturing features of democracy at the most abstract level. The "Deliberative democracy index" in particular captures to what extent the ideal of deliberative democracy is achieved. It ranges from low (0) to high (1).
Conceptually, it is defined as follows: "The deliberative component enshrines the core value that political decisions in pursuit of the public good should be informed by respectful and reasonable dialogue at all levels rather than by emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583).
Coding rules
The index is composed of several components and lower-level indices applying V-Dem's measurement model (Pemstein et al. 2021) which in turn are indices built from a number of indicators. The index itself is "a BFA [Bayesian factor analysis] attempting to measure the extent to which political elites offer public justifications for their positions on matters of public policy, justify their positions in terms of the public good, acknowledge and respect counter-arguments; and how wide the range of consultation is at elite levels (v2xdl_delib, based on 5 indicators)" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583) [emphasis in original; note that variable names in italics refer to V-Dem's nomenclature in their dataset, not in WeSIS].
For the exact index aggregation formula see Coppedge et al. 2021, Appendix A.
Bibliographic info
Citation: Coppedge, Michael, Staffan Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell. 2016. "Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data". International Political Science Review 37 (2): 580-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046
Related publications:- Coppedge, Michael, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning and Jan Teorell. 2015. "Measuring High Level Democratic Principles using the V-Dem Data". V-Dem Working Paper No. 6. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
- Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundtröm, Eitan Tzelgov, Luca Uberti, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2021. "V-Dem Codebook v11.1" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
- Pemstein, Daniel, Kyle L. Marquardt, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Juraj Medzihorsky, Joshua Krusell, Farhad Miri, and Johannes von Römer. 2021. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data”. V-Dem Working Paper No. 21. 6th edition. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
Misc
Project manager(s): Nils Düpont (A01)
Data release:- Version 0.001: Initial release
Revisions: No revisions yet
Sources
- Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Nazifa Alizada, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Garry Hindle, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Josefine Pernes, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, Steven Wilson and Daniel Ziblatt. 2021. "V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v11.1" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21