Difference between revisions of "Duty to bargain"
m |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|category=Labour and labour market | |category=Labour and labour market | ||
|label=Duty to bargain | |label=Duty to bargain | ||
| − | |relatedindicators=<ul><li>[[Right to collective bargaining]]</li | + | |relatedindicators=<ul> |
| − | + | <li>[[Right to collective bargaining]]</li> | |
| − | + | <li>[[Right to unionisation]]</li> | |
| − | + | <li>[[Extension of collective agreements]]</li> | |
| − | + | <li>[[Closed shops]]</li> | |
| − | + | <li>[[Codetermination board membership]]</li> | |
| + | <li>[[Codetermination and information/consultation of workers]]</li> | ||
| + | </ul> | ||
|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the employers duty of the right to reach an agreement with official collective actors in the country's constitution (flexibly interpreted in the case of countries without a codified constitution). The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to legal systems where employers may lawfully refuse to bargain with workers and "1" to employers have the legal duty to bargain and/or to reach an agreement with unions, works councils or other organizations of workers. | |description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the employers duty of the right to reach an agreement with official collective actors in the country's constitution (flexibly interpreted in the case of countries without a codified constitution). The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to legal systems where employers may lawfully refuse to bargain with workers and "1" to employers have the legal duty to bargain and/or to reach an agreement with unions, works councils or other organizations of workers. | ||
| − | |codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. As Adams et al. (2023) state “Some indicators use binary coding but most use non-binary or graduated scores. The template indicates the approach to scoring in each case. Some indicators are expressed as cardinal variables (for example, those relating to minimum qualifying periods of continuous employment) but most are expressed on an ordinal scale.” | + | |codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). Adams et al. (2023:20) describe the values of the variable "Duty to bargain" as "Equals 1 if employers have the legal duty to bargain and/or to reach an agreement with unions, works councils or other organizations of workers. Equals 0 if employers may lawfully refuse to bargain with workers. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law.". |
| − | The scale level for WESIS was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI | + | The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. As Adams et al. (2023:7) state “Some indicators use binary coding but most use non-binary or graduated scores. The template indicates the approach to scoring in each case. Some indicators are expressed as cardinal variables (for example, those relating to minimum qualifying periods of continuous employment) but most are expressed on an ordinal scale.”. The scale level for WESIS was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained because all variables are normalised on a 0-1 scale. Users should use the WESIS scale level with caution and consult the coding template (algorithm) and values. |
| − | |citation=< | + | |citation=<ul> |
| − | + | <li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li> | |
| − | + | <li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li> | |
| − | |relatedpublications=< | + | </ul> |
| − | + | |relatedpublications=<ul> | |
| − | + | <li>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li> | |
| − | |projectmanagers= | + | <li>Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li> |
| − | + | </ul> | |
| − | + | |projectmanagers=Responsible for data editing, description (WeSIS) and upload: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-2020, Version 0.001); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020) | |
| − | + | |datarelease=<ul> | |
| − | |datarelease=< | + | <li>Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)</li> |
| − | + | <li>Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)</li> | |
| − | + | </ul> | |
|revisions=No revisions yet | |revisions=No revisions yet | ||
| − | |sources= | + | |sources=<ul> |
| − | + | <li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li> | |
| + | <li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li> | ||
| + | </ul> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:52, 28 November 2024
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Metric |
| Value labels | Not applicable |
| Technical name | labor_duty_barg |
| Category | Labour and labour market |
| Label | Duty to bargain |
| Related indicators | |
This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the employers duty of the right to reach an agreement with official collective actors in the country's constitution (flexibly interpreted in the case of countries without a codified constitution). The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to legal systems where employers may lawfully refuse to bargain with workers and "1" to employers have the legal duty to bargain and/or to reach an agreement with unions, works councils or other organizations of workers.
Coding rules
The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). Adams et al. (2023:20) describe the values of the variable "Duty to bargain" as "Equals 1 if employers have the legal duty to bargain and/or to reach an agreement with unions, works councils or other organizations of workers. Equals 0 if employers may lawfully refuse to bargain with workers. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law.". The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. As Adams et al. (2023:7) state “Some indicators use binary coding but most use non-binary or graduated scores. The template indicates the approach to scoring in each case. Some indicators are expressed as cardinal variables (for example, those relating to minimum qualifying periods of continuous employment) but most are expressed on an ordinal scale.”. The scale level for WESIS was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained because all variables are normalised on a 0-1 scale. Users should use the WESIS scale level with caution and consult the coding template (algorithm) and values.
Bibliographic info
Citation:- Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
- Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
- Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
- Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
Misc
Project manager(s): Responsible for data editing, description (WeSIS) and upload: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-2020, Version 0.001); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
Data release:- Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)
- Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)
Revisions: No revisions yet
Sources
- Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
- Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
