Difference between revisions of "Right to collective bargaining"

From WeSISpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|scale=Metric
 
|scale=Metric
 
|scale=Metric
 
|scale=Metric
|valuelabels=<ul><li>1 = the constitution recognises and is granting a right to collective bargaining</li></ul>
+
|valuelabels=Not applicable
<ul><li>0.67 = the constitution is describing collective bargaining as a matter of public policy or public interest </li></ul>
 
<ul><li>0.33 = the constitution is recognising collective bargaining otherwise </li></ul>
 
<ul><li>0 = neither of the above </li></ul>
 
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of law
 
 
|techname=labor_coll_barg
 
|techname=labor_coll_barg
 
|category=Labour and labour market
 
|category=Labour and labour market
Line 18: Line 14:
 
<ul><li>[[Codetermination board membership]]</li></ul>
 
<ul><li>[[Codetermination board membership]]</li></ul>
 
<ul><li>[[Codetermination and information/consultation of workers]]</li></ul>
 
<ul><li>[[Codetermination and information/consultation of workers]]</li></ul>
|description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures whethers the legal system recognises or grants the right to collective bargaining or to enter into collective agreeements or not.
+
|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the protection of the right to collective bargaining or the right to enter into collective agreements in the country's constitution (loosely interpreted in the case of system such as the UK without a codified constitution). The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The variable scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the legal system do not recognise a right to collective bargaining (otherwise) and "1" to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Values in between describe, for example:
|codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the legal system do not recognise a right to collective bargaining and "1" to the legal system is granting the right to collective bargaining. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
+
<ul><li>0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights)
|citation=Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91.[http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]
+
<ul><li>0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution.
|relatedpublications=<ul>
+
|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023) describe, the value of the variable "right to collective bargaining" "Equals 1 if a right to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Equals 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights). Equals 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law."
<li>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]</li>
+
|citation=<br>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130<br>
 
+
Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
<li>Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x]</li></ul>
+
|relatedpublications=<br>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130<br>
|projectmanagers=Karolin Meyer, Jean-Yves Gerlitz
+
Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
|datarelease=<ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul>
+
|projectmanagers=<br>Responsible for data editing and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20)<br>
 +
Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>
 +
Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
 +
|datarelease=<br>Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)<br>
 +
Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)
 
|revisions=No revisions yet
 
|revisions=No revisions yet
|sources=<ul>
+
|sources=<br>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130<br>
<li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li></ul>
+
Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 13:30, 18 November 2024

Quick info
Data type Numeric
Scale Metric
Value labels Not applicable
Technical name labor_coll_barg
Category Labour and labour market
Label Right to collective bargaining
Related indicators

This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the protection of the right to collective bargaining or the right to enter into collective agreements in the country's constitution (loosely interpreted in the case of system such as the UK without a codified constitution). The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The variable scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the legal system do not recognise a right to collective bargaining (otherwise) and "1" to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Values in between describe, for example:

  • 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights)
    • 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution.

      Coding rules

      The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023) describe, the value of the variable "right to collective bargaining" "Equals 1 if a right to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Equals 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights). Equals 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law."

      Bibliographic info

      Citation:
      Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
      Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2

      Related publications:
      Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
      Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2

      Misc

      Project manager(s):
      Responsible for data editing and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20)
      Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger
      Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)

      Data release:
      Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)
      Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)

      Revisions: No revisions yet

      Sources


      Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
      Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.