Difference between revisions of "Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{IndicatorForm | {{IndicatorForm | ||
| − | |datatype = Numeric | + | |datatype=Numeric |
| − | |scale = Metric | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | |valuelabels = | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | <ul> | + | |scale=Metric |
| + | |valuelabels=<ul> | ||
<li>0 = no remedy is available as of right</li> | <li>0 = no remedy is available as of right</li> | ||
<li>0.33 = compensation is the normal remedy</li> | <li>0.33 = compensation is the normal remedy</li> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law | quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | |techname = | + | |techname=labor_reinstate |
| − | |category = | + | |category=Labour and labour market |
| − | |label = Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal | + | |label=Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal |
| − | |relatedindicators = | + | |relatedindicators=<ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li> | <li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li> | <li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<li>[[Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal]]</li> | <li>[[Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal]]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent reinstatement of an employee is the normal remedy for an unjust dismissal. | |
| − | |description = | + | |codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to no remedy being available as of right and "1" to reinstatement being the normal remedy for unjust dismissal that is regularly |
| − | This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent reinstatement of an employee is the normal remedy for an unjust dismissal. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to no remedy being available as of right and "1" to reinstatement being the normal remedy for unjust dismissal that is regularly | ||
enforced, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). | enforced, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). | ||
| − | + | |citation=Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004] | |
| − | |citation = | + | |relatedpublications=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |relatedpublications = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | ||
| Line 43: | Line 33: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |projectmanagers=Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer | |
| − | |projectmanagers = | + | |datarelease=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |datarelease = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | <li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |revisions=No revisions yet | |
| − | |revisions = | + | |sources=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |sources = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | <li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:22, 8 November 2021
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Metric |
| Value labels |
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law |
| Technical name | labor_reinstate |
| Category | Labour and labour market |
| Label | Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal |
| Related indicators | |
This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent reinstatement of an employee is the normal remedy for an unjust dismissal.
Coding rules
The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to no remedy being available as of right and "1" to reinstatement being the normal remedy for unjust dismissal that is regularly enforced, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
Bibliographic info
Citation: Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 33 (1): 59–91. http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004
Related publications:- Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
- Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x
Misc
Project manager(s): Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer
Data release:- Version 0.001: Initial release
Revisions: No revisions yet
Sources
- Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
