Difference between revisions of "Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{IndicatorForm | {{IndicatorForm | ||
| − | |datatype = Numeric | + | |datatype=Numeric |
| − | |scale = Metric | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | |valuelabels = | + | |scale=Metric |
| − | <ul> | + | |scale=Metric |
| + | |valuelabels=<ul> | ||
<li>0 = there are no procedural requirements for dismissal</li> | <li>0 = there are no procedural requirements for dismissal</li> | ||
<li>0.33 = failure to follow procedural requirement is just one factor taken into account in unjust dismissal cases</li> | <li>0.33 = failure to follow procedural requirement is just one factor taken into account in unjust dismissal cases</li> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law | quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | |techname = labor_pro_dis_con | + | |techname=labor_pro_dis_con |
| − | |category = | + | |category=Labour and labour market |
| − | |label = Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal | + | |label=Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal |
| − | |relatedindicators = | + | |relatedindicators=<ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li> | <li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li> | <li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal]]</li> | <li>[[Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal]]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent failure to follow procedural requirements constitute an unjust dismissal. | |
| − | |description = | + | |codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to an absense of procedural requirements and "1" to dismissals being necessarily being unjust if employers fails to follow procedural requirements, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). |
| − | This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent failure to follow procedural requirements constitute an unjust dismissal. | + | |citation=Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004] |
| − | + | |relatedpublications=<ul> | |
| − | |||
| − | |codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to an absense of procedural requirements and "1" to dismissals being necessarily being unjust if employers fails to follow procedural requirements, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). | ||
| − | |||
| − | |citation = | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |relatedpublications = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y] | ||
| Line 40: | Line 30: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |projectmanagers=Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer | |
| − | |projectmanagers = | + | |datarelease=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |datarelease = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | <li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| − | + | |revisions=No revisions yet | |
| − | |revisions = | + | |sources=<ul> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |sources = | ||
| − | <ul> | ||
<li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | <li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:20, 8 November 2021
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Metric |
| Value labels |
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law |
| Technical name | labor_pro_dis_con |
| Category | Labour and labour market |
| Label | Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal |
| Related indicators | |
This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent failure to follow procedural requirements constitute an unjust dismissal.
Coding rules
The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to an absense of procedural requirements and "1" to dismissals being necessarily being unjust if employers fails to follow procedural requirements, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
Bibliographic info
Citation: Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 33 (1): 59–91. http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004
Related publications:- Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
- Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x
Misc
Project manager(s): Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer
Data release:- Version 0.001: Initial release
Revisions: No revisions yet
Sources
- Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
