Difference between revisions of "Deliberative democracy index"

From WeSISpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Indicator
+
{{IndicatorForm
|datatype = Numeric
+
|datatype=Numeric
|scale = Metric
+
|scale=Metric
|valuelabels = Not applicable
+
|scale=Metric
|techname = polnat_polity_democ_delibdem_vdem
+
|scale=Metric
|category = [[Political_factors|Political factors]]
+
|valuelabels=Not applicable
|label = Deliberative democracy index
+
|techname=polnat_polity_democ_delibdem_vdem
|relatedindicators =  
+
|category=Political factors
<ul>
+
|label=Deliberative democracy index
 +
|relatedindicators=<ul>
 
   <li>[[Electoral democracy index]]</li>
 
   <li>[[Electoral democracy index]]</li>
 
   <li>[[Liberal democracy index]]</li>
 
   <li>[[Liberal democracy index]]</li>
Line 13: Line 14:
 
   <li>[[Egalitarian democracy index]]</li>
 
   <li>[[Egalitarian democracy index]]</li>
 
  </ul>
 
  </ul>
 
+
|description=The "Deliberative democracy index" is part of V-Dem's high level democracy indices capturing features of democracy at the most abstract level.
|description =  
 
The "Deliberative democracy index" is part of V-Dem's high level democracy indices capturing features of democracy at the most abstract level.
 
 
The "Deliberative democracy index" in particular captures to what extent the ideal of '''deliberative''' democracy is achieved. It ranges from low (0) to high (1).
 
The "Deliberative democracy index" in particular captures to what extent the ideal of '''deliberative''' democracy is achieved. It ranges from low (0) to high (1).
  
Line 21: Line 20:
 
"The deliberative component enshrines the core value that political decisions in pursuit of the
 
"The deliberative component enshrines the core value that political decisions in pursuit of the
 
public good should be informed by respectful and reasonable dialogue at all levels rather
 
public good should be informed by respectful and reasonable dialogue at all levels rather
than by emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion. The
+
than by emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583).
V-Dem measure is a BFA [Bayesian factor analysis] attempting to measure the extent to which political elites offer
+
|codingrules=The index is composed of several components and lower-level indices applying V-Dem's measurement model (Pemstein et al. 2021) which in turn are indices built from a number of indicators. The index itself is "a BFA [Bayesian factor analysis] attempting to measure the extent to which political elites offer public justifications for their positions on matters of public policy, justify their positions in terms of the public good, acknowledge and respect counter-arguments; and how wide the range of consultation is at elite levels (''v2xdl_delib'', based on 5 indicators)" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583) [emphasis in original; note that variable names in italics refer to V-Dem's nomenclature in their dataset, not in WeSIS].
public justifications for their positions on matters of public policy, justify their positions in
 
terms of the public good, acknowledge and respect counter-arguments; and how wide the
 
range of consultation is at elite levels (''v2xdl_delib'', based on 5 indicators)" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583).
 
 
 
 
 
|codingrules = The index is composed of several components and lower-level indices applying V-Dem's measurement model (Pemstein et al. 2019) which in turn are indices built from a number of indicators. For the index aggregation formula see Coppedge et al. 2019, Appendix A.
 
 
 
| citation =
 
<ul>
 
<li>Coppedge, Michael, Staffan Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell. 2016. "Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data". ''International Political Science Review'' 37 (2): 580-593. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046]
 
 
 
</li>
 
</ul>
 
  
|relatedpublications =  
+
For the exact index aggregation formula see Coppedge et al. 2021, Appendix A.
<ul>
+
|citation=Coppedge, Michael, Staffan Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell. 2016. "Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data". ''International Political Science Review'' 37 (2): 580-593. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046]
 +
|relatedpublications=<ul>
 
  <li>Coppedge, Michael, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning and Jan Teorell. 2015. "Measuring High Level Democratic Principles using the V-Dem Data". [https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b5/b8/b5b8a046-eb68-4a24-8a1f-771c57e34d03/v-dem_working_paper_2015_6.pdf V-Dem Working Paper No. 6]. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
 
  <li>Coppedge, Michael, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning and Jan Teorell. 2015. "Measuring High Level Democratic Principles using the V-Dem Data". [https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b5/b8/b5b8a046-eb68-4a24-8a1f-771c57e34d03/v-dem_working_paper_2015_6.pdf V-Dem Working Paper No. 6]. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
  <li>
 
  <li>
Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg,
+
Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundtröm, Eitan Tzelgov, Luca Uberti, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2021.
Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, M. Steven Fish, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna
+
"[https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/reference-material-v11/ V-Dem Codebook v11.1]" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.  
Lührmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Brigitte Seim,
 
Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Agnes Cornell, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw,
 
Valeriya Mechkova, Johannes von Römer, Aksel Sundtröm, Eitan Tzelgov, Luca Uberti, Yi-ting Wang,
 
Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2019. "[https://www.v-dem.net/en/reference/version-9-apr-2019/ V-Dem Codebook v9]". Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
 
 
  </li>
 
  </li>
 
  <li>
 
  <li>
Pemstein, Daniel, Kyle L. Marquardt, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Juraj Medzihorsky, Joshua Krusell, Farhad Miri, and Johannes von Römer. 2019. "The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data". [https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/60/a5/60a52aaf-008c-4d80-82ca-3bca827fbeb9/v-dem_working_paper_2019_21_4.pdf V-Dem Working Paper No. 21. 4th edition]. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
+
Pemstein, Daniel, Kyle L. Marquardt, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Juraj Medzihorsky, Joshua Krusell, Farhad Miri, and Johannes von Römer. 2021. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data”. [https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/d4/d2/d4d27532-96a7-4f8c-8028-4c356fb1b2ca/wp_21_6th_edition.pdf V-Dem Working Paper No. 21. 6th edition]. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
 
  </li>
 
  </li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
+
|projectmanagers=Nils Düpont (A01)
|projectmanagers =  
+
|datarelease=<ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul>
<ul>
+
|revisions=No revisions yet
<li>Nils Düpont (A01)</li>
+
|sources=<ul>
</ul>
+
  <li>Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Nazifa Alizada, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Garry Hindle, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Josefine Pernes, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, Steven Wilson and Daniel Ziblatt. 2021. "V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v11.1" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. [https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21 https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21]</li>
 
 
|datarelease =
 
<ul>
 
<li>The indicator is included in WeSIS rev. 1</li>
 
</ul>
 
 
 
|revisions =  
 
<ul>
 
<li>2019.10 Initial upload for WeSIS rev. 1</li>
 
</ul>
 
 
 
|sources =  
 
<ul>
 
  <li>Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, M. Steven Fish, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna Lührmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Steven Wilson, Agnes Cornell, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Laura Maxwell, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Josefine Pernes, Johannes von Römer, Natalia Stepanova, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2019. "V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v9". Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. [https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19 https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19]</li>
 
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 13:16, 25 October 2021

Quick info
Data type Numeric
Scale Metric
Value labels Not applicable
Technical name polnat_polity_democ_delibdem_vdem
Category Political factors
Label Deliberative democracy index
Related indicators

The "Deliberative democracy index" is part of V-Dem's high level democracy indices capturing features of democracy at the most abstract level. The "Deliberative democracy index" in particular captures to what extent the ideal of deliberative democracy is achieved. It ranges from low (0) to high (1).

Conceptually, it is defined as follows: "The deliberative component enshrines the core value that political decisions in pursuit of the public good should be informed by respectful and reasonable dialogue at all levels rather than by emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583).

Coding rules

The index is composed of several components and lower-level indices applying V-Dem's measurement model (Pemstein et al. 2021) which in turn are indices built from a number of indicators. The index itself is "a BFA [Bayesian factor analysis] attempting to measure the extent to which political elites offer public justifications for their positions on matters of public policy, justify their positions in terms of the public good, acknowledge and respect counter-arguments; and how wide the range of consultation is at elite levels (v2xdl_delib, based on 5 indicators)" (Coppedge et al. 2016, 583) [emphasis in original; note that variable names in italics refer to V-Dem's nomenclature in their dataset, not in WeSIS].

For the exact index aggregation formula see Coppedge et al. 2021, Appendix A.

Bibliographic info

Citation: Coppedge, Michael, Staffan Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell. 2016. "Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data". International Political Science Review 37 (2): 580-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115622046

Related publications:
  • Coppedge, Michael, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning and Jan Teorell. 2015. "Measuring High Level Democratic Principles using the V-Dem Data". V-Dem Working Paper No. 6. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
  • Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundtröm, Eitan Tzelgov, Luca Uberti, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2021. "V-Dem Codebook v11.1" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
  • Pemstein, Daniel, Kyle L. Marquardt, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Juraj Medzihorsky, Joshua Krusell, Farhad Miri, and Johannes von Römer. 2021. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data”. V-Dem Working Paper No. 21. 6th edition. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.

Misc

Project manager(s): Nils Düpont (A01)

Data release:
  • Version 0.001: Initial release

Revisions: No revisions yet

Sources

  • Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Nazifa Alizada, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Garry Hindle, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Josefine Pernes, Johannes von Römer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, Steven Wilson and Daniel Ziblatt. 2021. "V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v11.1" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21