Redundancy selection

Quick info
Data type	Numeric
Scale	Metric
Value labels	0 = employers does not have to follow priorty rules prior to dismissing for redundancy 1 = by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law
Technical name	labor_redund_select
Category	[[Labour and labour market]]
Label	Redundancy selection
Related indicators	Legally mandated notice period Legally mandated redundancy compensation Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal Third body notification of dismissal

This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent employers have to follow priority rules based on issues such as seniority, marital status, number of dependants etc. prior to a dismissal for redundancy.

Coding rules

The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to not having to follow priority rules and "1" to having to follow priority rules prior to a dismissal for redundancy, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).

Bibliographic info

Citation:

• Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 33 (1): 59–91. http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004

Related publications:

• Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
• Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x

Misc

Project manager(s):

• Jean-Yves Gerlitz
• Andrea Schäfer

Data release:

• Version 0.001: Initial release

Revisions:

• No revisions yet

Sources

• Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130