|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Indicator
| + | #REDIRECT [[Limits to overtime working (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]] |
| − | |datatype = Numeric
| |
| − | |scale = Metric
| |
| − | |valuelabels =
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li>0 = no limit exists</li>
| |
| − | <li>0.5 = a limit exists, but may be averaged out over a reference period of longer than a week</li>
| |
| − | <li>1 = maximum duration to weekly working hours, inclusive of overtime, for normal employment exists</li>
| |
| − | quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | |techname = labor_overt_work
| |
| − | |category = [[Labour and labour market |Labour and labour market]]
| |
| − | |label = Limits to overtime working
| |
| − | |relatedindicators =
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li>[[Annual leave entitlements]]</li>
| |
| − | <li>[[Public holiday entitlements]]</li>
| |
| − | <li>[[Overtime premia]]</li>
| |
| − | <li>[[Weekend working]]</li>
| |
| − | <li>[[Duration of the normal working week]]</li>
| |
| − | <li>[[Maximum daily working time]]</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | | |
| − | |description =
| |
| − | This CBR-LRI indicator measures the maximum weekly number of overtime hours permitted by law or by collective agreements which are generally applicable.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | |codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to the nonexistence of an overtime limit and "1" to a maximum duration to weekly working hours, inclusive of overtime, for normal employment. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
| |
| − | | |
| − | |citation =
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li>Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | | |
| − | |relatedpublications =
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li>
| |
| − | Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]
| |
| − | </li>
| |
| − | <li>
| |
| − | Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x]
| |
| − | </li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | | |
| − | |projectmanagers =
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li>Jean-Yves Gerlitz</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | | |
| − | |datarelease =
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li></li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | | |
| − | |revisions =
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li></li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | | |
| − | |sources =
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| − | }}
| |
