Broad protection laws for LGBTQ+ persons
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | {{{datatype}}} |
| Scale | Date |
| Value labels | {{{valuelabels}}} |
| Technical name | Cult_srg_prot_broad |
| Category | Culture |
| Label | Broad protection laws for LGBTQ+ persons (CRC 1342) |
| Related indicators | |
General discrimination protection regulations for LGBTQ+ persons not mentioned in the constitution and not sector-specific
Coding rules
The distinction between constitutional protection and broad protection laws: This distinction between regulations to non-discrimination has been adopted from the ILGA State-Sponsored Homophobia Report (Mendos et al. 2020). The distinction allows differentiating between non-discrimination laws adopted into a countries’ constitution and non-discrimination or protection laws adopted at a later point. The latter is coded in the indicator “broad protection laws” and often contains regulations with small laminations, for example only applying to certain instances. Constitutional protection laws in contrast are written into the country's fundamental legal regulations, and, while being a newer phenomenon and only applying to only recently funded states, these are more stringent regulations that apply to the entirety of a country’s legal framework and forbids discrimination due to sexual orientation specifically. Broad protection laws are coded if a country explicitly states the banning of discrimination due to sexual orientation. These regulations and bills were mostly added after the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and refer to sexual orientation as a specific instance of protection as opposed to broader, unclear “all persons” regulations as they are stated in the UDHR (UN, 1948). Workplace antidiscrimination laws regulate workplace behavior such as firing and hiring as well as promotion practices specifically.
For further information see the Technical Paper: Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Seitzer, Helen; Windzio, Michael. 2020 “Cultural Spheres – Creating a dyadic dataset of cultural proximity”. SFB 1342 Technical Paper Series, 5. Bremen, SFB 1342.
Bibliographic info
Citation: Please cite the respective version of the dataset, the technical paper, or: Seitzer, Helen. 2022. “The Diffusion of Workplace Antidiscrimination Regulations for the LGBTQ+ Community.” In Networks and Geographies of Global Social Policy Diffusion: Culture, Economy, and Colonial Legacies, edited by Michael Windzio, Ivo Mossig, Fabian Besche-Truthe, and Helen Seitzer, 227–253. Cham: Springer International Publishing https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83403-6_9.
Related publications:
Misc
Project manager(s): Fabian, Besche-Truthe, Michael, Windzio, Helen, Seitzer,
- Version 0.001: Initial release
Revisions: No revisions yet
Sources
The information collected in this dataset was collected and validated from the sources listed below and collected in early 2022. As some of the sources are conflicting, even citing different legal text, the earliest and most explicit text was used.
- https://ilga.org/state-sponsored-homophobia-report
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_by_country_or_territory
- https://internap.hrw.org/features/features/lgbt_laws/
- https://www.humandignitytrust.org/lgbt-the-law/map-of-criminalisation/
- https://www.equaldex.com/
- Mendos, Lucas Ramon, Kellyn Botha, Rafael Carran Lelis, Enrique Lopéz de la Penna, Ilia Savelev, and Daron Tan. 2020. “State-Sponsored Homophobia 2020: Global Legislation Overview Update.” Geneva.
- “Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” 1948. Paris: UN General Assembly.
