Difference between revisions of "Executive Recruitment Concept. Polity IV."
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|codingrules = Concept variable combines information presented in three component | |codingrules = Concept variable combines information presented in three component | ||
variables: XRREG, XRCOMP, and XROPEN (Table 3.1 in Marshall et al 2017). | variables: XRREG, XRCOMP, and XROPEN (Table 3.1 in Marshall et al 2017). | ||
| + | <style type="text/css"> | ||
| + | .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} | ||
| + | .tg td{font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;padding:10px 5px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;overflow:hidden;word-break:normal;border-color:black;} | ||
| + | .tg th{font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-weight:normal;padding:10px 5px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;overflow:hidden;word-break:normal;border-color:black;} | ||
| + | .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} | ||
| + | .tg .tg-7btt{font-weight:bold;border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} | ||
| + | .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} | ||
| + | </style> | ||
| + | <table class="tg"> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <th class="tg-7btt" rowspan="2">Polity IV Concept</th> | ||
| + | <th class="tg-7btt" colspan="2">Polity IV Component Variables</th> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-7btt">PARREG</td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-7btt">PARCOMP</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(1) Suppressed</td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Restricted (4)</td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Repressed (1)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(2) Restricted </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Restricted (4) </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Suppressed (2)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(3) Imposed Transition:<br>Loosening or tightening<br>restrictions<br></td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Sectarian (3) </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Suppressed (2)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(4) Uninstitutionalized</td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Unregulated (1) </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Not applicable (0)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(5) Gradual Transition from <br>Uninstitutionalized<br></td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Multiple Identity (2) </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Not applicable (0)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(6) Factional/Restricted </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Sectarian (3) </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Factional (3)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(7) Factional </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Multiple Identity (2) </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Factional (3)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(8) Electoral Transition<br>Persistent Conflict/Coercion<br></td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Sectarian (3) </td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Transitional (4)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(9) Electoral Transition: <br>Limited Conflict/Coercion<br></td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Multiple Identity (2)<br></td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Transitional (4)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-0pky">(10) Institutionalized Electoral <br></td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Regulated (5) <br></td> | ||
| + | <td class="tg-c3ow">Competitive (5)</td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | </table> | ||
Executive Recruitment concepts represent an alternative method for comprehending authority | Executive Recruitment concepts represent an alternative method for comprehending authority | ||
patterns and are explained in detail in Addendum A (Marshall et al 2017). | patterns and are explained in detail in Addendum A (Marshall et al 2017). | ||
Revision as of 18:13, 9 December 2019
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Multinomial |
| Value labels |
|
| Technical name | regime_polity_exrec |
| Category | Polity |
| Label | Executive Recruitment Concept |
| Related indicators | |
Index of Executive Recruitment.
Coding rules
Concept variable combines information presented in three component variables: XRREG, XRCOMP, and XROPEN (Table 3.1 in Marshall et al 2017). <style type="text/css"> .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} .tg td{font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;padding:10px 5px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;overflow:hidden;word-break:normal;border-color:black;} .tg th{font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-weight:normal;padding:10px 5px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;overflow:hidden;word-break:normal;border-color:black;} .tg .tg-c3ow{border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-7btt{font-weight:bold;border-color:inherit;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} .tg .tg-0pky{border-color:inherit;text-align:left;vertical-align:top} </style>
| Polity IV Concept | Polity IV Component Variables | |
|---|---|---|
| PARREG | PARCOMP | |
| (1) Suppressed | Restricted (4) | Repressed (1) |
| (2) Restricted | Restricted (4) | Suppressed (2) |
| (3) Imposed Transition: Loosening or tightening restrictions |
Sectarian (3) | Suppressed (2) |
| (4) Uninstitutionalized | Unregulated (1) | Not applicable (0) |
| (5) Gradual Transition from Uninstitutionalized |
Multiple Identity (2) | Not applicable (0) |
| (6) Factional/Restricted | Sectarian (3) | Factional (3) |
| (7) Factional | Multiple Identity (2) | Factional (3) |
| (8) Electoral Transition Persistent Conflict/Coercion |
Sectarian (3) | Transitional (4) |
| (9) Electoral Transition: Limited Conflict/Coercion |
Multiple Identity (2) |
Transitional (4) |
| (10) Institutionalized Electoral |
Regulated (5) |
Competitive (5) |
Executive Recruitment concepts represent an alternative method for comprehending authority patterns and are explained in detail in Addendum A (Marshall et al 2017).
Bibliographic info
Citation: Marshall, Monty G., Ted Robert Gurr, and Keith Jaggers. 2017. Dataset Users’ Manual. Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2016. Center for Systemic Peace. [1].
Related publications: related publications
Misc
Project manager(s): project managers
Data release: data release
Revisions: revisions
Sources
sources