Difference between revisions of "Rule of Law Quantile 2"
m (Fbesche moved page Cult rule vdem bin2 to Rule of Law Quantile 2) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|category= [[Culture|Culture]] | |category= [[Culture|Culture]] | ||
|label = Rule of Law Quantile 2 | |label = Rule of Law Quantile 2 | ||
| − | |relatedindicators = | + | |relatedindicators = <ul> |
| + | <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin1 | Rule of Law Quantile 1 ]] | ||
| + | <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin3 | Rule of Law Quantile 3 ]] | ||
| + | <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin4 | Rule of Law Quantile 4 ]] <ul> | ||
| + | |||
|description = Country is member of the second quantile of the Rule of Law index | |description = Country is member of the second quantile of the Rule of Law index | ||
|codingrules = We take the Rule of law index from V-Dem as another dimension of constructing our Cultural Spheres Dataset. According to V-Dem this index measures to what extent laws are “transparently, independently, predictably, impartially, and equally enforced […]” (Coppedge et al. 2019a, 269). The index, furthermore, includes measures on the extent of compliance with the law by government officials. We aim at operationalizing the value of what is called “Rechtsstaat” (constitutional state or rule of law). As with other political dimensions in our dataset we see this indicator as a manifestation of power struggles of a society against the state. These power struggles are driven by cultural values concerning obedience, trust in authority and equality of societal groups before this very authority. The index itself is a composite of several indices and ranges from 0-1 while covering a timeframe of 1789-2018. | |codingrules = We take the Rule of law index from V-Dem as another dimension of constructing our Cultural Spheres Dataset. According to V-Dem this index measures to what extent laws are “transparently, independently, predictably, impartially, and equally enforced […]” (Coppedge et al. 2019a, 269). The index, furthermore, includes measures on the extent of compliance with the law by government officials. We aim at operationalizing the value of what is called “Rechtsstaat” (constitutional state or rule of law). As with other political dimensions in our dataset we see this indicator as a manifestation of power struggles of a society against the state. These power struggles are driven by cultural values concerning obedience, trust in authority and equality of societal groups before this very authority. The index itself is a composite of several indices and ranges from 0-1 while covering a timeframe of 1789-2018. | ||
Revision as of 09:43, 3 May 2021
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Binary |
| Value labels | 1 = Yes, 0 = No |
| Technical name | cult_rule_vdem_bin2 |
| Category | Culture |
| Label | Rule of Law Quantile 2 |
| Related indicators | |
Country is member of the second quantile of the Rule of Law index
Coding rules
We take the Rule of law index from V-Dem as another dimension of constructing our Cultural Spheres Dataset. According to V-Dem this index measures to what extent laws are “transparently, independently, predictably, impartially, and equally enforced […]” (Coppedge et al. 2019a, 269). The index, furthermore, includes measures on the extent of compliance with the law by government officials. We aim at operationalizing the value of what is called “Rechtsstaat” (constitutional state or rule of law). As with other political dimensions in our dataset we see this indicator as a manifestation of power struggles of a society against the state. These power struggles are driven by cultural values concerning obedience, trust in authority and equality of societal groups before this very authority. The index itself is a composite of several indices and ranges from 0-1 while covering a timeframe of 1789-2018. We estimated quartiles for each year for the whole set of countries. Then we assigned the membership to a quartile based on the value the country has in the respective year. As we are estimating the quartiles separately for every year, and assigning the membership in a quartile separately, we have – in theory – a highly dynamic measure that is adapting to the overall evolution of the rule of law globally.
For further information see the Technical Paper:
Bibliographic info
Citation:
Related publications: NA (no information available)
Misc
Project manager(s): Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Windzio, Michael; Seitzer, Helen
Data release: 2020.11.23
Revisions: NA (no information available)
Sources
Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl H. Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, M. S. Fish, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna Lührmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Steven Wilson, Agnes Cornell, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Johannes von Römer, Natalia Stepanova, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2019b. “V-Dem Dataset 2019.”
