Standard-setting function - Revision history

Hfechner at 11:49, 5 February 2025

2025-02-05T11:49:33Z

ASchaefer at 10:57, 5 December 2024

2024-12-05T10:57:11Z

Nils Duepont at 12:39, 7 August 2023

2023-08-07T12:39:19Z

Nils Duepont at 12:32, 7 August 2023

2023-08-07T12:32:32Z

Stecor at 14:22, 8 November 2021

2021-11-08T14:22:54Z

Stecor at 14:22, 8 November 2021

2021-11-08T14:22:24Z

ASchaefer at 14:09, 19 May 2021

2021-05-19T14:09:05Z

ASchaefer at 07:43, 19 May 2021

2021-05-19T07:43:07Z

ASchaefer at 07:28, 19 May 2021

2021-05-19T07:28:54Z

ASchaefer at 14:29, 18 May 2021

2021-05-18T14:29:20Z

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 <li>[[Privileging function]]</li>
 <li>[[Equalising function]]</li>
 </ul>
 |description =
@@ Line 45: / Line 58: @@
 <li> Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger (2022). Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law, Industrial Law Journal, 51(3), p.560–597</li>
 </ul>
-|projectmanagers = Responsible for data editing, calculation, description (WESIS) and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025); Responsible for data coding: Heiner Fechner (2018-2025), Marina Carlino (2022-2025); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants for coding (alphabetical ordering): Julia Bode, Jessica Bonn, Daniel Euler, Jan-Christopher Floren, Maxime Fischer, Jennifer Götte, Eliko Hagen, Désirée Hoppe, Irina Kyburz, Alexandra Kojnow, Tarek Mahmalat, Karolin Meyer, Oguz Mermut, Johanna Nold, Tanusha Pali, Johannes Ramsauer, Max Sudhoff, Kristina Walter, Caroline Zambiasi
+|projectmanagers = Responsible for data editing, calculation, description (WESIS) and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Heiner Fechner (2018-2025); Responsible for data coding: Heiner Fechner (2018-2025), Marina Carlino (2022-2025); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants for coding (alphabetical ordering): Julia Bode, Jessica Bonn, Daniel Euler, Jan-Christopher Floren, Maxime Fischer, Jennifer Götte, Eliko Hagen, Désirée Hoppe, Irina Kyburz, Alexandra Kojnow, Tarek Mahmalat, Karolin Meyer, Oguz Mermut, Johanna Nold, Tanusha Pali, Johannes Ramsauer, Max Sudhoff, Kristina Walter, Caroline Zambiasi
 |datarelease =
 <ul>

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |relatedindicators =
 <ul>
 <li>[[Privileging function]]</li>
 <li>[[Equalising function]]</li>
 </ul>
-|description = The standard-setting function measures the level of general worker protection in individual labour law. The function refers to active norm-setting that defines general standards of legal protection. It consists of two relevant dimensions, working time restriction and dismissal protection, that are measured by 13 indicators based on legal norms. The indicator ranges from 0 to 1 where 1 is the maximum value reflecting the highest possible level of general worker protection.
+|description =
-|codingrules = The index calculation solely relies on 13 CBR-LRI indicators: Annual leave entitlements, Public holiday entitlements, Overtime premia, Weekend working, Limits to overtime working, Duration of the normal working week, Maximum daily working time, Legally mandated notice period, Legally mandated redundancy compensation, Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal, Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal, Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal and Third body notification of dismissal.
+"Standard-setting function" measures the level of general worker protection in individual labour law in place in a country during a particular year. The function refers to active norm-setting that defines general standards of legal protection. The indicator ranges from 0 to 1 where 1 is the maximum value reflecting the highest possible level of general worker protection. The variable is available for 115 countries from 1970 to 2013, using 13 CBR-LRI variables. The data from CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The "Standard-setting function" is recreated from the SPE-typology (see Dingeldey et al. 2020), which distinguishes the standard-setting (S), privileged (P) and compensatory (E) functions of labor law.<br>
-We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. The scales of the dimensions working time and dismissal protection are normalised, that is, we divided them by their empirical maximum.
+|codingrules =
 |citation =
-Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2022. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''Industrial Law Journal'' 51 (3): 560–597. [https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016 https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016]
+Schäfer, Andrea, Marina Carlino, Irene Dingeldey, Heiner Fechner, Ulrich Mückenberger and (2024). Standard-setting function data (2024). University of Bremen.
 |relatedpublications =
 <ul>
-<li>Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5'', Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf]</li>
+<li>Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>
-<li>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]</li>
+<li>Carlino, Marina, Fechner, Heiner, and Schäfer, Andrea (2025, forthcoming). Using leximetrics for coding legal segmentation in employment law: The development and potential of the Worlds of Labour database. In I. Dingeldey, H. Fechner, & U. Mückenberger (Eds.), Constructing Worlds of Labour. Coverage and Generosity of Labour Law as Outcomes of Regulatory Social Policy. Palgrave Macmillan. p.53-83 </li>
-<li>Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]</li>
+<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>
-<li>Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x]</li>
+<li>Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger (2020). Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law. SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5, Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf</li>
-<li>Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>
+<li> Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger (2022). Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law, Industrial Law Journal, 51(3), p.560–597</li>
 </ul>
 |revisions = No revisions yet
 |sources =
 <ul>
-<li> Own coding </li>
+<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>
 </ul>
 }}

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 |citation =
 Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2022. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''Industrial Law Journal'' 51 (3): 560–597. [https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016 https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016]
 |relatedpublications =
 <ul>
@@ Line 37: / Line 36: @@
 <li>Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>
 </ul>
-|projectmanagers =
+|projectmanagers = Andrea Schäfer
 |datarelease = <ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul>
 |revisions = No revisions yet
 |sources =
 <ul>

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |datatype = Numeric
 |scale = Metric
-|valuelabels = <ul>
+|valuelabels = Not applicable
 |techname =  labor_stand_sett_func
 |category = [[Labour and labour market |Labour and labour market]]
@@ Line 25: / Line 23: @@
 <li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>
 </ul>
-|description = The standard-setting function measures the level of general worker protection in individual labour law. The function refers to active norm-setting that defines general standards of legal protection. It consists of two relevant dimensions, working time restriction and dismissal protection, that are measured by 13 indicators based on legal norms.
+|description = The standard-setting function measures the level of general worker protection in individual labour law. The function refers to active norm-setting that defines general standards of legal protection. It consists of two relevant dimensions, working time restriction and dismissal protection, that are measured by 13 indicators based on legal norms. The indicator ranges from 0 to 1 where 1 is the maximum value reflecting the highest possible level of general worker protection.
 |codingrules = The index calculation solely relies on 13 CBR-LRI indicators: Annual leave entitlements, Public holiday entitlements, Overtime premia, Weekend working, Limits to overtime working, Duration of the normal working week, Maximum daily working time, Legally mandated notice period, Legally mandated redundancy compensation, Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal, Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal, Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal and Third body notification of dismissal.
 We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. The scales of the dimensions working time and dismissal protection are normalised, that is, we divided them by their empirical maximum.
 |citation =
-Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5'', Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf]
+Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2022. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''Industrial Law Journal'' 51 (3): 560–597. [https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016 https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016]
 |relatedpublications =
 <ul>
- <li>
+<li>Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5'', Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf]</li>
-Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]
+<li>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]</li>
- <li>
+<li>Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]</li>
-Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]
+<li>Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x]</li>
- <li>
+<li>Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>
 </ul>
 |projectmanagers =

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |datatype = Numeric
 |scale = Metric
-|valuelabels = 0 to 1. 1 is the maximum value, it reflects the highest possible level of general worker protection.
+|valuelabels = <ul>
 |techname =  labor_stand_sett_func
 |category = [[Labour and labour market |Labour and labour market]]