Rule of Law Quantile 1 - Revision history

Stecor at 17:40, 28 October 2021

2021-10-28T17:40:45Z

Fbesche at 13:19, 3 May 2021

2021-05-03T13:19:48Z

Fbesche at 13:18, 3 May 2021

2021-05-03T13:18:49Z

Fbesche at 13:18, 3 May 2021

2021-05-03T13:18:30Z

Fbesche at 13:17, 3 May 2021

2021-05-03T13:17:55Z

Fbesche at 08:42, 3 May 2021

2021-05-03T08:42:12Z

Fbesche at 08:41, 3 May 2021

2021-05-03T08:41:43Z

Fbesche: Fbesche moved page Cult rule vdem bin1 to Rule of Law Quantile 1

2021-04-29T14:09:46Z

Fbesche moved page Cult rule vdem bin1 to Rule of Law Quantile 1

Fbesche: Created page with " {{Indicator |datatype = Numeric |scale = Binary..."

2020-11-24T14:53:46Z

Created page with " {{Indicator |datatype = Numeric |scale = Binary..."

New page

{{Indicator
|datatype = Numeric
|scale = Binary
|valuelabels = 1 = Yes, 0 = No
|techname = cult_rule_vdem_bin1
|category= [[Culture|Culture]]
|label = Rule of Law Quantile 1
|relatedindicators = cult_spheres; cult_ rule_interpol_bin2; cult_ rule_interpol_bin3; cult_ rule_interpol_bin4
|description = Country is member of the first quantile of the Rule of Law index
|codingrules = We take the Rule of law index from V-Dem as another dimension of constructing our Cultural Spheres Dataset. According to V-Dem this index measures to what extent laws are “transparently, independently, predictably, impartially, and equally enforced […]” (Coppedge et al. 2019a, 269). The index, furthermore, includes measures on the extent of compliance with the law by government officials. We aim at operationalizing the value of what is called “Rechtsstaat” (constitutional state or rule of law). As with other political dimensions in our dataset we see this indicator as a manifestation of power struggles of a society against the state. These power struggles are driven by cultural values concerning obedience, trust in authority and equality of societal groups before this very authority. The index itself is a composite of several indices and ranges from 0-1 while covering a timeframe of 1789-2018.
We estimated quartiles for each year for the whole set of countries. Then we assigned the membership to a quartile based on the value the country has in the respective year. As we are estimating the quartiles separately for every year, and assigning the membership in a quartile separately, we have – in theory – a highly dynamic measure that is adapting to the overall evolution of the rule of law globally.

For further information see the Technical Paper:

|citation =
|relatedpublications = NA (no information available)
|projectmanagers = Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Windzio, Michael; Seitzer, Helen
|datarelease = 2020.11.23
|revisions = NA (no information available)
|sources = Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl H. Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, M. S. Fish, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna Lührmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Steven Wilson, Agnes Cornell, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Johannes von Römer, Natalia Stepanova, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2019b. “V-Dem Dataset 2019.”
}}

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 We estimated quartiles for each year for the whole set of countries. Then we assigned the membership to a quartile based on the value the country has in the respective year. As we are estimating the quartiles separately for every year, and assigning the membership in a quartile separately, we have – in theory – a highly dynamic measure that is adapting to the overall evolution of the rule of law globally.
-For further information see the Technical Paper: [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/sfb-1342-publikationen/sfb-1342-technical-paper-series?publ=10072 | Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Seitzer, Helen; Windzio, Michael. 2020 “Cultural Spheres – Creating a dyadic dataset of cultural proximity”. SFB 1342 Technical Paper Series, 5. Bremen, SFB 1342.]
+For further information see the Technical Paper: [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/sfb-1342-publikationen/sfb-1342-technical-paper-series?publ=10072 Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Seitzer, Helen; Windzio, Michael. 2020 “Cultural Spheres – Creating a dyadic dataset of cultural proximity”. SFB 1342 Technical Paper Series, 5. Bremen, SFB 1342.]
 |citation =

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 We estimated quartiles for each year for the whole set of countries. Then we assigned the membership to a quartile based on the value the country has in the respective year. As we are estimating the quartiles separately for every year, and assigning the membership in a quartile separately, we have – in theory – a highly dynamic measure that is adapting to the overall evolution of the rule of law globally.
-For further information see the Technical Paper: [[https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/sfb-1342-publikationen/sfb-1342-technical-paper-series?publ=10072 | Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Seitzer, Helen; Windzio, Michael. 2020 “Cultural Spheres – Creating a dyadic dataset of cultural proximity”. SFB 1342 Technical Paper Series, 5. Bremen, SFB 1342.]]
+For further information see the Technical Paper: [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/sfb-1342-publikationen/sfb-1342-technical-paper-series?publ=10072 | Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Seitzer, Helen; Windzio, Michael. 2020 “Cultural Spheres – Creating a dyadic dataset of cultural proximity”. SFB 1342 Technical Paper Series, 5. Bremen, SFB 1342.]
 |citation =

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 We estimated quartiles for each year for the whole set of countries. Then we assigned the membership to a quartile based on the value the country has in the respective year. As we are estimating the quartiles separately for every year, and assigning the membership in a quartile separately, we have – in theory – a highly dynamic measure that is adapting to the overall evolution of the rule of law globally.
-For further information see the Technical Paper: [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/sfb-1342-publikationen/sfb-1342-technical-paper-series?publ=10072 | Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Seitzer, Helen; Windzio, Michael. 2020 “Cultural Spheres – Creating a dyadic dataset of cultural proximity”. SFB 1342 Technical Paper Series, 5. Bremen, SFB 1342.]
+For further information see the Technical Paper: [[https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/sfb-1342-publikationen/sfb-1342-technical-paper-series?publ=10072 | Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Seitzer, Helen; Windzio, Michael. 2020 “Cultural Spheres – Creating a dyadic dataset of cultural proximity”. SFB 1342 Technical Paper Series, 5. Bremen, SFB 1342.]]
 |citation =

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |label = Rule of Law Quantile 1
 |relatedindicators = <ul>
-  <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin2 | Rule of Law Quantile 2 ]]<li>
+  <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin2 | Rule of Law Quantile 2 ]]
-  <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin3 | Rule of Law Quantile 3 ]]<li>
+  <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin3 | Rule of Law Quantile 3 ]]
-  <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin4 | Rule of Law Quantile 4 ]]<li> <ul>
+  <li>[[cult_rule_vdem_bin4 | Rule of Law Quantile 4 ]] <ul>
 |description = Country is member of the first quantile of the Rule of Law index

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 |citation =
 |relatedpublications = NA (no information available)
-|projectmanagers = Besche-Truthe, Fabian; Windzio, Michael; Seitzer, Helen
+|projectmanagers = Fabian Besche-Truthe, Michael Windzio, Helen Seitzer
-|datarelease = 2020.11.23
+|datarelease = <ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul>
-|revisions = NA (no information available)
+|revisions = No revisions yet
 |sources = Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl H. Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, M. S. Fish, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Anna Lührmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Steven Wilson, Agnes Cornell, Lisa Gastaldi, Haakon Gjerløw, Nina Ilchenko, Joshua Krusell, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Johannes von Römer, Natalia Stepanova, Aksel Sundström, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2019b. “V-Dem Dataset 2019.”
 }}

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 |category= [[Culture|Culture]]
 |label = Rule of Law Quantile 1
-|relatedindicators = cult_spheres; cult_ rule_interpol_bin2; cult_ rule_interpol_bin3; cult_ rule_interpol_bin4
+|relatedindicators = <ul>
 |description = Country is member of the first quantile of the Rule of Law index
 |codingrules = We take the Rule of law index from V-Dem as another dimension of constructing our Cultural Spheres Dataset. According to V-Dem this index measures to what extent laws are “transparently, independently, predictably, impartially, and equally enforced […]” (Coppedge et al. 2019a, 269). The index, furthermore, includes measures on the extent of compliance with the law by government officials. We aim at operationalizing the value of what is called “Rechtsstaat” (constitutional state or rule of law). As with other political dimensions in our dataset we see this indicator as a manifestation of power struggles of a society against the state. These power struggles are driven by cultural values concerning obedience, trust in authority and equality of societal groups before this very authority. The index itself is a composite of several indices and ranges from 0-1 while covering a timeframe of 1789-2018.

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:09, 29 April 2021
(No difference)