Right to collective bargaining - Revision history

ASchaefer at 09:49, 28 November 2024

2024-11-28T09:49:47Z

ASchaefer at 08:56, 27 November 2024

2024-11-27T08:56:31Z

ASchaefer at 09:20, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T09:20:03Z

ASchaefer at 09:10, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T09:10:14Z

ASchaefer at 09:07, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T09:07:41Z

ASchaefer at 09:06, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T09:06:46Z

ASchaefer at 09:05, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T09:05:08Z

ASchaefer at 08:53, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T08:53:48Z

ASchaefer at 08:49, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T08:49:33Z

ASchaefer at 13:43, 18 November 2024

2024-11-18T13:43:27Z

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |category=Labour and labour market
 |label=Right to collective bargaining
-|relatedindicators=<ul><li>[[Right to unionisation]]</li></ul>
+|relatedindicators=<ul>
-<ul><li>[[Duty to bargain]]</li></ul>
+<li>[[Right to unionisation]]</li>
-<ul><li>[[Extension of collective agreements]]</li></ul>
+<li>[[Duty to bargain]]</li>
-<ul><li>[[Closed shops]]</li></ul>
+<li>[[Extension of collective agreements]]</li>
-<ul><li>[[Codetermination board membership]]</li></ul>
+<li>[[Closed shops]]</li>
-<ul><li>[[Codetermination and information/consultation of workers]]</li></ul>
+<li>[[Codetermination board membership]]</li>
 |description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the protection of the right to collective bargaining or the right to enter into collective agreements in the country's constitution (loosely interpreted in the case of system such as the UK without a codified constitution). The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" to legal systems not recognizing a right to collective bargaining (otherwise) and "1" to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Values in between describe, for example:
 <ul><li>0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights)</li></ul>
@@ Line 19: / Line 21: @@
 |codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). As Adams et al. (2023:20) describe, the value of the variable "Right to collective bargaining" "Equals 1 if a right to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Equals 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights). Equals 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law."
 The assessment of the scale levels of all variables in the CBR-LRI documentation and the specification of the values in the template are partially incongruent. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons.
-|citation=<br>
+|citation=<ul>
-* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
+<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>
-* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
+<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>
-|relatedpublications=<br>
+</ul>
-* Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
+|relatedpublications=<ul>
-* Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
+  <li>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>
-|projectmanagers=<br>
+  <li>Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>
-* Responsible for data editing, description (WESIS) and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20, Version 0.001)
+</ul>
-* Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>
+|projectmanagers=Responsible for data editing, description (WeSIS) and upload: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-2020, Version 0.001); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
-* Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
+|datarelease=<ul>
-|datarelease=<br>
+  <li>Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)</li>
-* Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)
+  <li>Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)</li>
-* Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)
+</ul>
 |revisions=No revisions yet
-|sources=* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
+|sources=<ul>
-* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
+  <li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>
 }}

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 <ul><li>0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights)</li></ul>
 <ul><li>0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution</li></ul><br>
-|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023:20) describe, the value of the variable "Right to collective bargaining" "Equals 1 if a right to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Equals 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights). Equals 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law."
+|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). As Adams et al. (2023:20) describe, the value of the variable "Right to collective bargaining" "Equals 1 if a right to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Equals 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights). Equals 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law."
 |citation=<br>
 * Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 |revisions=No revisions yet
 |sources=* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
-* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.
+* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
 }}

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 <ul><li>0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights)</li></ul>
 <ul><li>0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution</li></ul><br>
-|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023) describe, the value of the variable "Right to collective bargaining" "Equals 1 if a right to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Equals 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights). Equals 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law."
+|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023:20) describe, the value of the variable "Right to collective bargaining" "Equals 1 if a right to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Equals 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights). Equals 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law."
 |citation=<br>
 * Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 <ul><li>0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution</li></ul><br>
 |codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023) describe, the value of the variable "Right to collective bargaining" "Equals 1 if a right to collective bargaining is expressly granted by the constitution. Equals 0.67 if collective bargaining is described as a matter of public policy or public interest (or mentioned within the chapter on rights). Equals 0.33 if collective bargaining is otherwise mentioned in the constitution. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law."
-|citation=* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
+|citation=<br>
 * Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
-|relatedpublications=* Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
+|relatedpublications=<br>
 * Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
-|projectmanagers=* Responsible for data editing, description (WESIS) and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20, Version 0.001)
+|projectmanagers=<br>
 * Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>
 * Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
-|datarelease=* Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)
+|datarelease=<br>
 * Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)
 |revisions=No revisions yet

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 |relatedpublications=<br>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130<br>
 Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
-|projectmanagers=<br>Responsible for data editing and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20)<br>
+|projectmanagers=<br>Responsible for data editing, description (WESIS) and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20, Version 0.001)<br>
 Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>
 Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)