View source for Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal

{{Indicator
|datatype = Numeric
|scale = Metric
|valuelabels = 
<ul>
<li>0 = no remedy is available as of right</li>
<li>0.33 = compensation is the normal remedy</li>
<li>0.67 = reinstatement and compensation are, de-jure and de-facto, alternative remedies</li>
<li>1 = reinstatement is the normal remedy for unjust dismissal and is regularly enforced</li>
quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law
</ul>
|techname =  labor_reinstate 
|category = [[Labour and labour market |Labour and labour market]]
|label = Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal
|relatedindicators = 
<ul>
<li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li>
<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li>
<li>[[Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal]]</li>
<li>[[Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal]]</li>
<li>[[Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal]]</li>
</ul>

|description = 
This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent reinstatement of an employee is the normal remedy for an unjust dismissal.


|codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to no remedy being available as of right and "1" to reinstatement being the normal remedy for unjust dismissal that is regularly
enforced, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).

|citation = 
<ul>
<li>Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]
</ul>

|relatedpublications = 
<ul>
 <li>
Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]
 </li>
 <li>
Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x] 
 </li>
</ul>

|projectmanagers = 
<ul>
 <li>Jean-Yves Gerlitz</li>
<li>Andrea Schäfer</li>
</ul>

|datarelease =
<ul>
 <li></li>
</ul>

|revisions = 
<ul>
 <li></li>
</ul>

|sources = 
<ul>
 <li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>
</ul>
}}